Saturday, November 17, 2012

Hi all [1].  I'm starting a new blog set today.  Gardening.

First off, 'WTF? Gardening?', 'What is he thinking?'.  Good questions.  I have no gardening expertise.  For the majority of my life my gardening experience has been, mow it, chop it down, or dig it up.  Things haven't changed a great deal.  However, I was trying to do some research the other day and there isn't a lot of info that seems to be about people who have actually chucked a plant in the ground and expected it to grow.

A bit of background: my wife an I own about 2 acres.  It is separated into 3 roughly equal yards - front yard, back yard and bush.  The front and back yard are separated by the house and some small fence portions, and are the most developed, they were already reasonably established when we first moved in.  The bush is a slopping lightly wooded area that was overrun with giant-rat-tail-grass when we moved it.  It has been a little over 3 years and we are at last starting to see some actual changes in the way that the garden may eventually look - partially because I have recently been successful in growing things.  We will come back to that.

First lets talk about the property.  Overall the lot is approx 50 meters wide at front and rear, and approx 150 meters long on either side.  The lot is separated depth wise into the front, back and bush yards, and is within 500 meters of a major river.  Soil is consistently sandy river sediment for approx 1 foot down to a layer of grey clay for about 4 inches, followed by a denser red river sand with other mixed elements.  Areas around the house and drive way have differing levels of building refuse mixed into the topsoil, and this sometimes complicates propagation.

The front yard is approx 40 meters deep and has a driveway that is partially grassed/gravel, it widens out to the car ports and has a narrow right hand portion with some palm trees, and a wider right hand portion about half the yard that has a range of other shrubs and an occasional tree also.  The whole front yard in general slopes north away front the house, but only fractionally, visually it appears to be flat.  When we moved in, both sides were wildly over grown, and it was difficult to see how much yard actually was available.  It also was very wet.  At some point a berm had been built up around the border of the left hand side, thus creating an area about half the size of the front yard that could not run off in heavy rain.  Instead it sits and eventually evaporates.  In periods of heavy rain, it will sit and almost stay as a swamp for weeks until dry weather returns.  The east and northern fence line were overrun with tall grass weeds and a few other hedge like plants.  The very centre was dominated by several thorny bushes that took up a space roughly 10 meters x 5 meters.  There were several lilli-pilli shrubs and also many palm trees in a corner area near the house.  There are also a few smaller native trees standing about 3 meters, a 10-15 meter Ghost-Gum is the prominent feature.  A few other trees also existed.  On the right hand side there were a lot of palm trees and a few other overgrown shrubs and several weeping natives that were massively overgrown as well.

The back yard is also approx 40 meters deep.  It has the majority of the house itself on its 'side' of the fence and also has the shed, sandpit, cubby house, water tanks and clothes line.  The whole yard slopes generally  south west away from the house, although visually it looks flat.  The last 5 meters of so towards the rear fence begins a gentle slope that steepens in the bush yard.  On purchase the back lawn had not been mowed for several months, the septic lines had over grown to several feet, the sand pit was not able to be seen for the weeds growing in it and the rear fence was preceded by many piles of refuse.  The west side had a small lilli-pilli garden with a few palm trees and then a range of rambling hedge like plants and again a considerable growth of weed grasses.  A ground level sand pit was almost impossible to identify due to the quantity of weeds growing from it.  There was really only 3 trees in this yard.  A leopard tree towards the west of the house and some gum trees of about 5 meters towards the south east corner.  There were two shrubs over the septic line and a lot of grass and refuse towards the rear fence.  On the east side of the house was a creeper that was taking over a portion of the house, it was quickly removed before it damaged the house further.

The bush yard was [is] the most overgrown.  It is approx 70 meters deep and starts with a gentle slope, then has a steep section, before becoming more gentle to almost flat at the bottom of the yard.  It is approx 5 meters lower at the bottom than the top of the yard.  On purchase the entire bush yard was overgrown with giant-rat-tail-grass.  There were also piles of refuse - garden, building and other - in this yard.  It is only fenced on 3 sides, with a 4th fence line with an adjoining  un-developed property in semi completion.  This is also the most heavily wooded yard.  the majority of the yard has most likely never been cleared.  There are some very large ghost gum trees including a very tall specimen of at least 20 meters.  However the majority of the yard is populated with iron bark trees.  There are a few open spaces such as the top north west corner and the bottom of the yard, these may have been cleared in the previous role as agricultural land or during developments of fence lines during the development of the residential estate.

Well that gives you a run down of the property as we found it.  Next I will talk about some of the changes that we have made and plan to make in the future.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

LEGO - Friends...and the Gender debate

LEGO is bringing out a new range of sets next year [2012] targeted at the young female market. The Friends line re-tools the classic LEGO minifigure into a cute young fashionable girl. This coupled with a new range of colours and sets themed towards girls has generated masses of debate in both geek culture and in the toy market itself. I'm not going to review the sets here - I'll do that in another post - here I want to raise two points of contention:

1. Has LEGO stepped over the line by making 'Girls LEGO'?, and
2. Is it really their fault?

First I want to make it clear that I am keen to pick up the LEGO Friends product, from my point of view, it looks cool, and very collectable. Part of this is because LEGO has tried 'Girls LEGO' before, and usually it dies a slow horrible death. The Friends line might be worth a mint within 18 months.

So have the stepped over the line? In short, no. However there is the obvious gender characterisation that is inherent with what the Friends line means, but lets look at LEGO briefly in there history. Going on to 3/4 of a century now, LEGO has been producing generic play toys for a long time. However things started to change significantly in that late 70s and early 80s with the Legoland line of sets that were less of generic groups of blocks with open play, and more restrictive towards building of certain models certain ways. The generic blocks were still available, but the majority of market push was for the Town, Space and Castle sets. Inadvertently they pigeonholed themselves into gender-specific play. It has since then expanded to include each of their ranges as they become more and more targeted towards a male play gender role. And I'm sure as licensing began in the late 90s starting with Star Wars, then the process continues to narrow towards a male target market. Bear in mind that I'm talking about generalisations here - I'm well aware that boys play with girls toys and vice versa, but they are exceptions not mass rules. Marking relies on mass rules, and very little on exceptions. As such to target that other gender of society, they had to do something that was more inline with generally accepted gender roles of play for the fairer sex.

'But the minifigures are not minifigures, and the sets are all ponies and pink n stuff???'. I hear you, part of me dislikes the idea that the Friends minifigs will not sit well in with the rest of my LEGO collection and all of my female minifigs to this point will suddenly look like rather butch ugly dwarves. However we also need to understand that the minifigure is 23 years old, with next to no change in design except for hair and facial expressions and few new accessories. The new Friends minifigs are targeted to the market, and the market as a whole is looking for something...prettier. I believe that we need to recognise that the new line is not meant to be integrated into your LEGO City scape, but an equivalent LEGO capability that is more female targeted.

In short the Friends range is aimed at providing gender role play targeted at girls with equivalent exploration and modification that is provided in the sets that are more gender role orientated to boys. As the ads are saying, its LEGO [models in increasing complexity sets] for girls. If you want to get the generic building blocks, then they are still available.

Is it really all LEGOs fault? It would be so easy to say that LEGO have fallen trap to their own marketing, and are now trying to convince us that its still LEGO, its just designed towards a female market...etc, etc, etc. Easy, but not true. LEGO have finally figured out what humanity has known for millennia, but has tried to stifle in the last century. Boys and girls are not the same.

Now that I have recovered from all the sharp objects thrown in my direction, I'll say something even more thought [and pain] provoking. The sexes are not equal [ducks for cover]. Now I will clarify that. While I believe that the sexes are not equal, I am not saying that they shouldn't have equal opportunity. Biologically, male is different from female, otherwise why have a difference at all in the first place. This means that even from an early age girls and boys approach things differently. This is what LEGO has been researching in the last 4 years and spending reportedly close to $1billion on. We may have enjoyed the equalization of the sexes over the last century, but that densest meant that they both develop the same way or play in the same manner.

Marketing and toy companies have picked up on this in the last 2 decades. Just walk in to any department store and you will find an aisle of pure pink set aside for just the girls [targeted] toys. There will definetly be a generic aisle and then usually a fairly general boys aisle as well. But for me the real indication that the 'generic toy' push had died was when McDonalds started asking you if you wanted a boy toy or a girl toy with the happy meal.

In this type of newly boy / girl marketing environment, could LEGO really keep hoping that they were capturing those girls that like LEGO for LEGO? I think not. In fact the evidence speaks for itself, they have tried before...many times. What they have not tried to do quite as well before is present a wide range of sets that are as difficult and as explorable as the rest of their current range.

In short I think LEGO finally realised that girls like LEGO. But they wanted their own version, not a watered down version, nor a complete digression from what LEGO is [the LEGO Jewelry range for eg.]. So now we all wait and see if all their research means that they got it right. Will LEGO Friends be LEGO...for girls.

Check out the LEGO Friends range when it goes live on 26 Dec 2011 here



Wednesday, December 21, 2011

LEGO, Sharonberg - the early days

Remember LEGO. I do. I had small collection of LEGO from when I was young, and this has been kept in near immaculate [but dusty] condition. Now i have set it up again, and with the additon of my son's LEGO sets that he has accumulated, and the sets that I have squired recenlty, were building Sharonberg...in the shed.

Photos to follow,

Thursday, September 30, 2010

RAInf with LSW - 40mm


Australian Army Infantry Soldier from the East Timor UNTAET campaign armed with F89 Minimi LSW.

This is a photo of one of the models I painted a few years ago. The model is an OzMade miniature in 40mm. The model itself is not bad quality considering the size of the OzMade environment.

Paints were all Citadel from teh time, and you can see clearly my heavy use of drybrusing and inking.



Why now?

I bought a new camera, and it has a funky telephoto detail auto setting which makes miniature happy snaps really easy...and this is the first miniature that I could find [without digging through boxes in the shed]

Looking at the mini up close is not so good now, because I can see where I could have done a much better job. Hallen's faithful will remember this one sitting in the display cabinet for quite some time.

Monday, August 30, 2010

New Looks...and Satoshi Kon Dead!

First things first...Satoshi Kon has died of pancreatic cancer? WTF? check it out here. Madhouse are responsible for some of the more eccentric [and thus sometimes better] anime series of late, and Satoshi Kon has had some memorable features the often attempt to drag Anime away from the public perception of 'cartoons' [Western public]. He'll be sadly missed [especially at just 48].

In less interesting news...we went to a black presentation...because the green was bothering me.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

New SodaPop Minis...

Kisa & Isabeau Now Available!

SodaPop Miniatures released two more of there range today. The figures have been floating around in the sneak peeks for a while, but are now available for purchase.

And now for the bad news...pay day is still three weeks away.

Personally, I think I prefer the Isabeau Durand figure.

See them / Buy them here.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Ultramarines: The Movie

So, GW have finally got a CGI production company that has done something towards a Warhammer 40,000 movie.

See the first trailer here...

And then you can come back and comment.

I've been keeping track of development of this project for a while now. So far it looks a little clean, and it was always going to be a problem getting a decent story. Thankfully, Dan Abnett [Gaunt's Ghosts author] has come on board.

The trailer looks...OK, hopefully they will tidy up some of the really obvious problems before its goes to release.